Ethical Issues in Human Cloning Essay

In the modern society, copy has been described as the man-made, genetic duplicate of a nonher living form (United Nation Educational, scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO, 2005). Cloning of mammals has been a far-fetched idea to some scientists for a very long time. However, in 1997, Dr. Ian Wilmut, along with his team, successfully cloned a honey from a mature ewe (Kass & Wilson, 1998). This announcement has caused a lot of positivistic and negative responses from aesculapian and non-medical communities.Protests from religious groups, bioethicists, merciful raceitarians, and the general public led originator President Clinton, the United States president of that time, to form the National Bioethics Advisory heraldic bearing (NBAC) (Campbell, 1997). This committee then published a report and concluded that homophile clone was morally unacceptable. It was then that government funds have been prohibit to be provided for human cloning research, making it illegal (Kas s & Wilson, 1998). Critics of human cloning dispute that human cloning provides a consequence of medical risks that may harm the clone and the progenitor (Huang, 2001).Ninety percent of ill fortune rate and high mortality rates in animal cloning have been reported. Dolly, the first lamb clone, was euthanized for developing old- progress diseases despite her young age (Kass & Wilson, 1998). To create one successful clone, a huge number of unsuccessful embryos also have to be sacrificed. This concept has resulted in scandalisation among the critics of cloning for killing innocent clones for the benefit of one (Kuppuswamy, Macer, Serbulea, & Tobin, 2007). apart from the medical risks of cloning, human generative cloning may also corrupt the concept of kin and human reproduction (Kass & Wilson, 1998).A successfully cloned child would also have to face psychological problems such as personal identity and individuality. Designer babies and human enhancements will also b e provided by reproductive cloning. Babies with perfect features and desirable characteristics will be functional to high elucidate societies because of the high-priced value of making them. Low class societies, on the other hand, will not be able to present these babies, thereby creating a new form of discrimination that would further add-on the gap between the rich and poor (Piercy, 1999).With human enhancements available, diseased and alter people could be categorized as the undesirables. This implies that the lives of such persons are not worth living (Quick, n. d. ). In the society today, life is promoted and extended as much as possible. Discrimination is frowned upon and despised by all. Such good issues and many more are still being argued because of human reproductive cloning. Until these ethical issues are resolved, human cloning will still be morally unacceptable in the society. ReferencesCampbell, C. (1997). Cloning human beings Religious opinion on human cloning. Retrieved from http//bioethics. georgetown. edu/nbac/pubs/cloning2/cc4. pdf. Huang, N. (2001). The ethics of human genetic cloning. MURJ, 4, 6975. Retrieved from http//web. mit. edu/murj/ vane/v04/v04-Features/v04-f6. pdf. Kass, L. , & Wilson, J. (1998). The ethics of human cloning. Washington, CD AEI Press. Kuppuswamy, C. , Macer, D. , Serbulea, M. , & Tobin, B. (2007). Is human reproductive cloning inevitable Future options for UN governance.Yokohama, Japan United Nations University Institute of advanced Studies. Retrieved from http//www. ias. unu. edu/resource_centre/Cloning_9. 20B. pdf. Piercy, E. (1999, December). Human cloning scientific, ethical and regulatory considerations relevant to cloning of human beings. Retrieved from http//www. aph. gov. au/house/committee/laca/humancloning/sub240. pdf. Quick, S. (n. d. ). Stem cell research and cloningScience and ethics (Rev. ed). Retrieved May 27, 2010, from www. ethicalhealthcare. org/articles/quick_scr_cloning_ethics. pd f.